I appreciate all the comments that I received on yesterday’s post, which is why I think the discussion should continue. Yesterday, Alice Lloyd commented:
 
WELL MY THING IS I THINK WE LOST TWO PEOPLE IN THIS TRAGEDY TENNILLE WASN’T THE TYPE OF PERSON TO JUST SHOOT SOMEONE THERE WAS BAD BLOOD FROM MAYBE A YEAR AGO WE ALWAYS LISTEN TO A ONE SIDED STORY SHE HAS ONE TO TELL ALSO AND IT SHOULD BE HEARD. IT WASN’ T RIGHT SHE SHOULD HAVE REALLY TOOK TWO SECONDS TO THINK .BUT WE ALSO LOST HER TO THE SYSTEM.
 
I agree with Lloyd, especially after the update in the Tribune today. Apparently, Tennille Tyson was refused bail today, after which she started to cry. The Trib also fleshed out the story a bit more. According to the paper, Tyson’s boyfriend used to date one of the Marsh sisters (Tyson shot Kadeidrah Marsh on March 15). Tyson was mad because her boyfriend stayed friends with his ex, and one of the Marsh sisters told the boy to dump Tyson because she was “bad news.” Right before the shooting, Tyson supposedly told her beau, “I had to shoot her.”
 
Really? She had to shoot her? Why? Was it self defense? What’s going on here? I have yet to hear Tyson’s voice in this matter, and frankly I’d like to. This is a case filled with contradictions. Here is a girl who shot another girl because she “had to,” yet sought the help of a religious man and cried in the courtroom. Who is Tennille Tyson, and why did she do what she did?